Hello, fellow law nerds.

Welcome to another episode of Boom Lawyer, a rewire.

Dot News podcast hosted by the legal journalism team that is super excited that the University

of Virginia won the NCAA championship. Woo, woo, woo, wahoo,

go who's, et cetera. I'm Imani Gandhi. Go Bucky. And I'm Jess Piclo. Rewire. Dot News is

dedicated to bringing you the best reproductive rights and social justice news, commentary,

and analysis on the web. And the Team Legal podcast is part of that mission.

So a big thanks to our subscribers and a welcome to our new listeners.

Alliance Defending Freedom and Conservative Women's Groups want the Supreme Court to take a case that would give school districts

the ability to affirmatively discriminate against transgender students.

The case is called Jane Doe versus

Boyertown Area School District, and while there's plenty of reasons for the court not to take the case,

ADF has it framed in such a way that it may be too tempting for the Roberts Court to pass up.

Grown. Grown.

Big grown.

So in this episode, we're going to talk about that case.

We're going to talk about what's at stake in that case, and we're going to groan.

So, Jessica, where do we begin? Can you just tell us a little bit about what this case is all about?

Sure. We begin with the fact that this case is a trap. It's a trap. Flat out, a trap.

It's a tarp!

Insert your Star Wars tip right there. Unlike a lot of the trans cases that we are used to that we see a trans student or an employee who's suing to have their rights enforced, this case involves cisgender students challenging their school's trans inclusive policy.

And they're arguing that by allowing trans students to use bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity, the school districts are violating there the cisgender student's privacy rights.

...