Rep. James Comer: Democrat 'quid pro quo' argument stronger with Biden than Trump
John Solomon Reports
John Solomon
4.7 • 6.3K Ratings
🗓️ 8 December 2022
⏱️ 64 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Rep. James Comer (R-KY) criticized President Biden for trying to get Saudi Arabia to have OPEC+ "increase oil production before the election," arguing that was more of "a quid pro quo" than Democrats' first impeachment argument against former President Trump.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | You're listening to me for free right now, and that's awesome because more and more things aren't free right now. |
| 0:05.4 | I mean, think about all the things you're paying for daily, monthly yearly. |
| 0:08.8 | Well, here's something that won't add to that list, the free iHeartRadio app, podcasts, streaming music, digital radio. |
| 0:15.8 | All free, it's the future of audio and unlike almost everything else in your life right now, |
| 0:20.4 | except maybe air, it doesn't cost a dollar. |
| 0:23.2 | So take advantage of this, listen to everything you love on the iHeartRadio app for free. |
| 0:27.6 | iHeartRadio! |
| 0:37.2 | Hello America and Happy Thursday and a busy Thursday it is we have a lot of breaking news |
| 0:44.0 | that you're going to enjoy today. |
| 0:46.1 | And starting with an exclusive story that we broke on just the news that further illustrates how |
| 0:50.8 | far the United States government under the color of law has gone to censor Americans free speech |
| 0:58.6 | to force pressure, cajole, encourage social media platforms and search engines to block |
| 1:07.9 | American's content, social postings, opinions, things that we have long suspected were |
| 1:14.0 | protected under the First Amendment, which declares that the government shall pass no law that |
| 1:18.8 | won fringe on the right of free expression. |
| 1:21.3 | And the Supreme Court has extended to say that includes the behavior of federal agencies |
| 1:26.4 | authorized by Congress. |
| 1:28.0 | So therefore the federal government can't infringe free speech. |
| 1:31.6 | And yet we know it's been going on a month ago we broke the story |
| 1:35.8 | about the Homeland Security created consortium, a private group called the Election Integrity |
| 1:42.1 | Partnership that went out on behalf of government agencies and under the color of government agencies |
| 1:46.7 | and encourage social media to censor things. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Solomon, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of John Solomon and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

