meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakpoint

Religious Freedom and the Coronavirus

Breakpoint

Colson Center

News, Religion & Spirituality, News Commentary, Christianity

4.8 • 2.8K Ratings

🗓️ 14 April 2020

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The media narratives that have emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic are varied. Some, like the lack of supplies for medical personnel and first responders are important. Others, like the stories about churches and their defiant pastors who refuse to comply with physical-distancing and stay-at-home orders, are mostly selective and overblown.

Of course, there are a few churches and pastors behaving badly. A few. A very few. Less than one percent, in fact. To suggest that they are representative of all Christians is both misleading and slanderous.

Also largely ignored in so many of the stories about these churches is the fact that in many towns, counties, and states, the stay-at-home orders are confusing. Some are even illegal.

Understandably, many Christians struggle to know how to take the alarming headlines about pastors being arrested, and many churches and Christian ministries struggle to know how to carry out their mission at this time. Kristen Waggoner, vice-president of the Alliance Defending Freedom, told me that ADF is receiving about 100 calls a day from churches and other ministries about COVID-19 related issues, asking for help in understanding and complying with federal, state, county, and municipal orders. That regulations are being issued at four levels of government is just one of the potential problems. The orders not confusing and inconsistent are, at times, being applied and enforced inconsistently, or in ways discriminatory against the free exercise of religion.

The most important thing to remember, as Kristin Waggoner stated emphatically during the podcast, is that First Amendment rights cannot be suspended permanently. This is why the threat from New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio to permanently close some churches even after the crisis is manifestly absurd.

Two main requirements must be met for any infringement on religious freedom, including during a time of national or local emergency. First, any infringement must advance a compelling state interest and, second, it must be done in the least restrictive way possible.

What constitutes a “compelling state interest” will, of course, vary according to the circumstances. For example, the government could have a compelling interest to limit how people can gather during an emergency or, even, how many people can gather, though this would infringe on religious liberty. That’s what the Kansas Supreme Court ruled over the weekend.

The orders, however, must be clear. A person should be able to understand what is and what is not restricted without having to hire a lawyer. According to Waggoner, many of the COVID-19 restrictions fail this clarity test, especially at the local level.

Unclear restrictions make inconsistent enforcement by government nearly inevitable. This is especially true when local officials have an agenda and see an opportunity to take advantage of a crisis to crack down on groups that they don’t like, including religious ones. For instance, in Charlotte and Greensboro, North Carolina believers were arrested for praying outside abortion clinics, even though they were obeying local distancing orders.

Last week, the mayor of Louisville, KY, inexplicitly attempted to bar a church from holding a drive-in service, a service where no one gets out of their car. A federal judge sided, scathingly so, with the church, writing in his opinion that “On Holy Thursday, an American mayor criminalized the communal celebration of Easter. That sentence is one that this Court never expected to see outside the pages of a dystopian novel, or perhaps the pages of The Onion.”

I was encouraged when Kristin Waggoner told me that, most of the time, a simple letter written to state and local officials pointing out problems or seeking clarification in their orders, is all it takes. The professionality of Alliance Defending Freedom is one of their best tools, but they are pretty good in court too.

Even in the best of times, guarding our First Amendment freedoms can be an uphill battle. And these are not the best of times. That’s why I am grateful that Kristen Waggoner and ADF are there to help guide us through these confusing times.

My interview with Kristen Waggoner is live on the BreakPoint podcast.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

In the midst of this coronavirus crisis, Christians can care both for those who are suffering and for religious liberty.

0:08.3

In fact, we must care about both.

0:10.6

For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street.

0:12.7

This is Breakpoint.

0:14.5

The media narratives that have emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic are varied.

0:19.3

Some, like the lack of supplies for medical personnel and first responders,

0:23.0

are very important. Others, like the stories about churches and their defiant pastors who refuse

0:28.5

to comply with physical distancing and stay-at-home orders, well, they're mostly selective

0:33.3

and overblown. Of course, there are churches and pastors behaving badly, a few, a very few,

0:39.8

less than 1% in fact, to suggest that they're somehow representative of all Christians is both

0:45.2

misleading and slanderous. Also, largely ignored in so many of these stories about these churches,

0:50.8

is the fact that in many towns, counties, and states, the stay-at-home orders

0:56.4

are, well, confusing. Some might even be illegal. Understandably, many Christians struggle to know

1:02.6

how to take the alarming headlines about pastors being arrested, and many churches and Christian

1:07.9

ministry struggle to know how to carry out their mission at this time.

1:12.3

Kristen Wagoner, vice president of the Alliance Defending Freedom, told me that ADF is now receiving

1:18.2

about 100 calls a day from churches and other ministries about COVID-19 related issues

1:24.5

that are asking for help and understanding and complying with federal, state,

1:29.2

county, and municipal orders. That regulations are being issued at these four levels of government

1:34.4

is just one of the potential problems. And the orders not confusing or inconsistent are at times

1:40.7

being applied and enforced inconsistently or in ways discriminatory against the free

1:46.0

exercise of religion. The most important thing to remember, as Christian Wagoner stated emphatically

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.