meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Regime Uncertainty Past and Present

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Cato, Peace, Policy, Politics, Markets, Defense, Government, News, News Commentary, 424708, Immigration, Libertarian

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 21 February 2014

⏱️ 27 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Friday, February 21st, 2014.

0:05.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:07.0

Regime uncertainty is broadly the difficulty in believing that the law is the law.

0:12.0

For businesses and individuals individuals such uncertainty makes it

0:14.7

harder to plan for the economy it can be disastrous. Robert Higgs is a senior fellow

0:19.8

in political economy at the Independent institute and author of the classic

0:23.5

Crisis in Leviathan along with many other books.

0:26.4

We spoke earlier this week about regime uncertainty past and present.

0:30.7

In a very general sense, what can we say about economic interventions and their costs and benefits?

0:38.0

Well I think we can say that there's always a presumption that the free market will allow a process to take place which produces the

0:50.9

greatest net benefits for the public in general.

0:55.0

And that doesn't mean that there's any kind of perfection about that process.

1:00.0

It simply means that so-called imperfections that the economists might identify in it

1:08.0

are imperfections relative to a kind of ideal or a blackboard model of how an economy would best operate, but that

1:18.1

blackboard model is not the same thing as the real world.

1:22.1

So when it's used as the rationale for government intervention,

1:28.6

very often those interventions do nothing more than make the market process itself operate more poorly in the service of consumers in general and the general public.

1:39.0

Interventions, at least within the United States until very recently broadly had the

1:46.0

approval of Congress that was you had the president and Congress agreeing

1:49.7

on something and then it was carried out. In more recent years this president with

1:55.1

respect to where he drops bombs and when with respect to having a law become effective specifically Obamacare has largely ignored

2:07.0

law what is that what does that mean specifically? Well I think the the tendency toward a greater

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.