The race is on, and Red Bull's request to review Lewis Hamilton's British Grand Prix penalty in the hope of securing a harsher punishment has been rejected.

But the war of words has continued today in the Hungara ring paddock.

I'm Ed Straw and I'm joined by Scott Mitchell

to explain what's happened and the implications on the title battle. Well, we'll dive straight

into it because there's lots to talk about, but first let's just stress what this was. This was

not a review of the penalty, but effectively the pre-hearing, which was to judge whether or not

Red Bull had brought the required new evidence to the table to justify reopening the case.

For a review to be approved, the FIA's International Sporting Code demands the production of

a significant and relevant new elements which was unavailable to the party seeking the review

at the time of the decision

concerned. So Scott, what did Red Bull submit and why wasn't it enough? So Red Bull's case was

partly based on GPS data that was available to the stewards at the time of the original

decision and partly its own simulated events. And the steward summary stated that Rebel's evidence consisted of several slides that

showed GPS data of Hamilton and Bastappen going into COPS, GPS data from Hamilton's

successful pass on Charlotte Clare at COPS later in the race,

alleged lap simulations of the incident, and a reenactment of Hamilton's line based on a lap allegedly

driven by Alex Albon. I think you can tell from that list itself why the petition was

dismissed. It was dismissed on the grounds that Red Bull's new evidence was not new evidence

at all. And it certainly wasn't discovered. It was created by the team

specifically for the purpose of submission. And obviously, the use of GPS data from Hamilton and

Gestappen, that was data that was already there at the time. So the stewards concluded that Red Bull

clearly didn't satisfy the requirements to merit a review. So it means

...