Reconciling ObamaCare
Cato Podcast
Cato Institute
4.5 • 979 Ratings
🗓️ 10 March 2010
⏱️ 7 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Wednesday, March 10, 2010. I'm Caleb Brown. |
| 0:09.0 | Reconciliation was a process created to help Congress balance the books at the end of a year. |
| 0:14.4 | Now the process is being used to push through a health care reform that will |
| 0:18.0 | contribute to deficits. So says Michael Tanner, senior Fellow at the Cato Institute. |
| 0:27.0 | Well, last week, the President signaled his support |
| 0:31.0 | for the reconciliation process, kind of the nuclear option when it comes to |
| 0:36.0 | health care reform. Reconciliation is an obscure parliamentary tactic that's designed to circumvent filibusters. |
| 0:47.4 | You basically force a up or down vote that only requires 50 members of the Senate plus Vice President Joe |
| 0:55.2 | Biden in order to pass something. That way the Republicans can't use their usual |
| 1:01.0 | filibuster tactics in order to stop health care sort of negates the election of Scott Brown and Massachusetts. |
| 1:08.0 | However, this is not an easy process to do. |
| 1:12.0 | It's going to create a great many problems in both the House and |
| 1:15.3 | the Senate if they try to move forward with this. |
| 1:17.7 | Without an individual mandate, it gets very hard to do a lot of dictates about what goes into what plans and what kind of |
| 1:27.7 | coverage people are going to be provided. Well that's absolutely right and that's |
| 1:30.8 | part of what makes it so difficult to move the health care |
| 1:34.0 | reform under the reconciliation process. Reconciliation can really only be |
| 1:38.8 | used for budget items. It was created back in the 1970s to make it easier for Congress to balance its books at the end of the year. |
| 1:47.0 | The idea was that if you had budgeted $100 billion and you were coming in at $102 billion, you could go back and cut a couple of |
| 1:54.6 | billion out in order to make the books balance without having to go through all the |
| 1:58.2 | bigger moral of a filibuster. So it's really can't do policy changes. It's just budget changes. That means a lot of what they want to do in terms of health care reform can't go through the normal reconciliation process. |
| 2:12.0 | So reconciliation was in some sense a product of a time when people took deficits a lot more seriously than they do now. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

