Hey, realignment listeners, Marshall and Saga here.

We are back with exclusive content for supercast subscribers.

This year, if you'd like to get full access to the Q&A that we're about to get into here today,

you can submit your own questions and up for others at realignment.supercast.com.

There you can support the show five a month, 50 year year or 500 for lifetime

membership. I'm really excited that as part of our efforts, we're going to be upping the amount

of great exclusive content and of course, help fund the show onto the first question.

And once again, that's realignment.supercast.com or the link at the top of the show notes.

This is the free question that we're offering you all as a preview of what we're up to.

And of course, we'd love to you once again, doffered the show,

so support and to get in on all this great stuff for republishing this year onto the first question.

This is from Matt. Hey, Marshall and Saga, you guys make the best show in my podcast feed.

Thank you, Matt, onto the question.

We have all heard the polyannish idea that a common enemy such as China,

well, somehow magically brage American political divides.

And that's not what I want to discuss.

Instead, do you think that a rising China means an end to the growing,

unseriousness we've seen in politics since the end of the Cold War?

In short, it's political buffoonery, simply a luxury of America's

agemony that's bound to expire as a look back on the Cold War political divides

or foreign policy and domestic policy. They were just as deep as today.

McCarthy hearings, political violence, watergate, civil rights, Vietnam, around

...