The Sunday Times over in the UK reporter, they had a source who said Richard Gabb was against

calling it a true story, but Netflix insisted it needed to be. How significant could that be if that

turns out to be true? It's one thing if Richard Gadd says to them, it's true, it's true

or true, and they fail to do their due diligence. It's even worse is if Richard Gadd says,

well, I don't really want this to be a true story.

And Netflix says, no, no, no, no, no.

We want it to be true.

Fiona Harvey, the real Martha from Baby Raneer,

is suing Netflix for a whopping $175 million.

The 34-page lawsuit claims the streaming giant is responsible for the biggest lie in TV history

over his portrayal as Fiona as a twice convicted and twice jailed stalker.

It also contends that Netflix did nothing to prevent Harvey from being identified and that as a result,

her life has been ruined.

Well, media commentators say the result of the case could change her true stories

are portrayed in TV and cinema forever.

Well, Fiona Harvey's U.S. legal representative, Richard Roth, joins me now from New York.

Mr. Roth, thank you very much for Dave, joining me.

Hey, Pierce, thank you for having me.

But my first question is an obvious one,

but why have you taken Fiona's case? I think there's probably three reasons. Obviously,

I'm in the business of making money, and I think there's a lot of money to be made here.

I think the second reason is that it is really just reprehensible when someone says something's a true story and it isn't.

...