meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

RAW COURT AUDIO: Karen Read’s Legal Battle Intensifies as Courtroom Tensions Rise PART 2

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

News, True Crime, News Commentary

3.3907 Ratings

🗓️ 26 February 2025

⏱️ 60 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

RAW COURT AUDIO: Karen Read’s Legal Battle Intensifies as Courtroom Tensions Rise PART 2 
Karen Read and her attorneys appeared in court Tuesday for a hearing that could have major implications for her defense. The session followed a dramatic pause last week when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings after expressing “grave concern” over new details presented by Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan.

Brennan had introduced documents and a $24,000 invoice, arguing that Read’s attorneys engaged experts from ARCCA, an accident reconstruction firm, despite previously telling the court they had not met with these witnesses. The ARCCA experts are crucial to the defense’s claim that Read did not strike her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, with her SUV and leave him to die in a snowstorm on January 29, 2022. Read’s attorneys contend she was framed and that law enforcement was involved in O’Keefe’s death.

When the hearing resumed, Judge Cannone noted inconsistencies between Brennan’s claims and her recollection but also questioned why defense attorney Alan Jackson had told her in February that there was no additional discovery related to the ARCCA witnesses.

Defense attorney Robert Alessi pushed back, arguing that any inconsistencies were due to miscommunications rather than intentional deception. “I don’t think it’s the defense that’s creating ghosts, allusions, and shields here,” he said, throwing Brennan’s own words back at him. He also pointed out what he called multiple misstatements from Brennan, arguing that the prosecution had not been entirely transparent either.

Brennan countered that the ARCCA witnesses were falsely presented as independent. “We know that we are getting a fraction of the story,” he said, suggesting that missing records indicate additional undisclosed communication between the defense and these witnesses.

Outside the courthouse, Read was asked whether she feared losing members of her defense team. “Of course, I’d be worried to lose any member of my defense team,” she said. When asked what that would mean, she added, “It would mean an appeal.”

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is a special report from True Crime Today and the Hidden Killers podcast.

0:08.2

I'm Tony Bruske. Thanks for joining us. Let's head to the courtroom where Karen Reed's

0:12.3

hearing is resuming after the grave concern comment was raised last week by Judge Beverly

0:18.8

Canoni. Let's go to the courtroom.

0:22.5

That's correct.

0:24.6

Mr. Wolf sent in questions that he proposed Mr. Jackson asked,

0:31.4

but that's why I underscored so many times the fact that came from Dr. Wolf to Mr. Jackson.

0:39.7

It's not Mr. Jackson asking questions in that document. It's Dr. Wolf sending them in. And Your Honor, I'm going to

0:46.4

speculate if I could and I'm not going to do this often in my presentation. But I do

0:50.9

know a fact and I do know and a fact I know secondhand.

0:56.0

If we put ourselves in Dr. Wool's position, we think it's odd for attorneys, imagine him.

1:02.0

He's about to sit on the stand in one of the most visible cases in the country.

1:08.0

He is an experienced expert. He's used to interacting with attorneys.

1:13.6

He is not having the level of interaction and preparation anywhere near what he's used to having.

1:20.6

But he's got to go on to stand with his professional reputation, and he's nervous. He's nervous.

1:26.6

So my speculation, he sends in the direct to try to get some degree of comfort.

1:35.3

So with all due respect, please don't speculate. Let's move on to the merits, okay?

1:39.3

I will not.

1:40.3

You can use this maybe at argument at some point, but let's just focus on what we have.

1:44.1

I will do that, Your Honor.

1:46.2

If you know for certain that's the case, that's fine.

1:49.2

I will tell you, and first of all, I appreciate what you said, and I won't speculate anymore.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.