meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Rationally Speaking Podcast

Rationally Speaking #31 - Vegetarianism

Rationally Speaking Podcast

New York City Skeptics

Philosophy, Society & Culture, Science

4.6787 Ratings

🗓️ 27 March 2011

⏱️ 52 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Vegetarianism is a complex set of beliefs and practices, spanning from the extreme “fruitarianism,” where people only eat fruits and other plant parts that can be gathered without “harming” the plant, to various forms of “flexitaranism,” like pollotarianism (poultry is okay to eat) and pescetarianism (fish okay). So, what does science have to say about this? What is the ethical case for vegetarianism? And, is it true that vegetarians are more intelligent than omnivores? Not unexpectedly, the answers are complex, so the debate will rage on.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Rationally speaking is a presentation of New York City skeptics dedicated to promoting critical thinking, skeptical inquiry, and science education.

0:22.5

For more information, please visit us at NYCCEceptics.org.

0:35.6

Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense.

0:41.1

I am your host, Massimo Piliucci, and with me as always is my co-host Julia Galev.

0:46.2

Julia, what's our topic today?

0:48.0

Massimo, this episode, we're going to take a rational look at the case for vegetarianism and veganism.

0:53.8

This is a topic that I've written about

0:55.8

several times for the rationally speaking blog, and Michael Dodora, another contributor, has also written

1:00.3

about it, and we've had guest bloggers discuss it too. And it reliably draws some of the longest

1:05.3

and most heated comment threads on the rationally speaking blog. So I think it's high time that we

1:09.7

laid out the relevant evidence and arguments. Sounds good. Why don't we start? Actually, I have a little list of different

1:15.7

types of vegetarianism, which may be useful for our discussion, also for our listeners,

1:19.8

but perhaps we should actually start by acknowledging, first of all, what our position is, what we are.

1:25.9

Oh, well. And then talk about it why we are maybe perhaps or what the problems may be.

1:31.7

Okay, I don't know if I can do mine briefly.

1:35.0

Well, so in practice, the way I eat most closely resembles a vegan.

1:42.1

I don't usually call myself a vegan just because I differ from

1:46.8

vegans and my reasons for what I eat or don't eat somewhat. And in fact, I think I

1:53.2

probably don't have a lot in common with most vegans in terms of my reasons for doing it.

1:57.8

So you're a differently principled vegan.

2:02.2

Well... Or something like that. Okay. The best... I've sort of cycled through a few different

2:07.0

terms just because it's always useful to have a shorthand or label. The closest one that I've

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New York City Skeptics, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of New York City Skeptics and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.