meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Rationally Speaking Podcast

Rationally Speaking #16 - Deferring to Experts

Rationally Speaking Podcast

New York City Skeptics

Philosophy, Society & Culture, Science

4.6787 Ratings

🗓️ 29 August 2010

⏱️ 35 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

At a talk he gave at TAM 8, Massimo argued that non-experts in a field aren't qualified to reject an expert consensus, such as that on anthropogenic climate change. Most recently, he has taken Jerry Coyne to task for making a philosophical argument without having the necessary expertise. This raises a number of questions: Are there fields that have no experts, or that have pretend experts? If there is a lot of disagreement among experts on a topic, should we take any individual expert's opinion less seriously? How much consensus is required before a non-expert should say, "OK, looks like this question really is settled"?

Perhaps noted expert George Carlin had it right when he said: "I have as much authority as the pope, I just don't have as many people who believe it."

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Rationally speaking is a presentation of New York City skeptics dedicated to promoting critical thinking, skeptical inquiry, and science education.

0:22.5

For more information, please visit us at NYCCEptics.org.

0:35.6

Welcome to rationally speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense.

0:41.5

I'm your host, Massimo Piliucci, and with me, as always, is my co-host Julia Gileff.

0:46.3

Julia, what are we going to talk about today?

0:48.8

Well, Massimo, a number of recent conversations we've been having on our blog, Rationally Speaking,

0:53.5

have started coming back to the

0:55.1

question of when is it appropriate for non-experts to defer to the opinion of experts? So that's the

1:03.8

question we're going to ask today. And in doing so, we're also going to look at a few case

1:09.3

studies of fields in the sciences, social sciences,

1:13.0

maybe even philosophy, and ask, are there some fields that don't actually have experts?

1:18.7

Or are there fields that have pretend experts?

1:21.8

Sure.

1:22.2

Think that they're experts, but they're not.

1:24.1

Right.

1:25.3

For instance, let me give you a quote from an expert in the field, George Carlin,

1:30.9

who once said, I have as much authority as the Pope.

1:33.6

I just don't have as many people who believe it.

1:36.3

Right.

1:36.9

So this would be a good example of a case in which a consensus in a field is not enough

1:43.2

to make it appropriate for us to conclude that they're

1:47.9

correct. So this is something that I want to talk about. And you raised the issue of expert consensus

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New York City Skeptics, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of New York City Skeptics and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.