Raging Bull
Unspooled
Paul Scheer & Amy Nicholson
4.5 • 5K Ratings
🗓️ 28 November 2019
⏱️ 103 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Once was a podcast hosted by Amy and Paul. They liked to have fun. Yes, they had a ball. |
| 0:05.0 | They talked about movies until they were full. The year is 1980. The movie Raging Ball. |
| 0:31.0 | Hello everybody and welcome to unspilled. I'm Amy Nichols and I am Paul Sharon. This is the podcaster. |
| 0:37.0 | Each week we watch one film from the AFI's top 100 greatest films of all time list. |
| 0:41.0 | We are watching from the 2007 edition to see if these films are really as good as people say. |
| 0:46.0 | Do they hold up now and how have they influenced the films that we watch today? |
| 0:50.0 | How have they? Tell me the truth. |
| 0:52.0 | Have they? Amy, the film we're talking about today is Raging Ball. |
| 0:56.0 | The film we talked about last week was Annie Hall. Before we get into Raging Ball, I wanted to talk about some of our listeners comments about Annie Hall. |
| 1:05.0 | Let's jump right in. |
| 1:07.0 | I'll start with Mark Evan-Nef at Question Mark Navhiroot Handspulled. When Amy said Alvi is the only one who can stop time, I thought, he's Zach Morris. |
| 1:17.0 | I love that. |
| 1:20.0 | You know what? Who, I guess I didn't realize the save by the bell was kind of like the cultural brother of Annie Hall. |
| 1:27.0 | I mean, it makes sense. I can't believe they didn't pitch the show that way. I cannot believe they didn't put that in all the posters. |
| 1:32.0 | So Lewis Kamerah writes, I just finished listening to the episode and I'm not surprised that the negative review was by John Simon. |
| 1:38.0 | Who was notoriously mean-spirited and nasty. Roger Ebert had this to say about him. |
| 1:43.0 | Strip away all that false pretension and you'll find a real pretension inside. He does a great act but read his actual reviews and you'll find that he uses intellectual scare tactics to conceal his fundamental lack of sympathy for film. |
| 1:55.0 | It's not that he's too hard on movies. It's that he doesn't understand them. And he understands their audiences even less. |
| 2:02.0 | The critic has been criticsed. |
| 2:04.0 | I love that. That's a really interesting point of view and really a damning critique on a critic from a critic that I really enjoy. |
| 2:12.0 | We don't read a lot of Roger Ebert on the show but that's a real damning takedown. That is. That is. And I think that is actually a fair. |
| 2:20.0 | I think that it has a personality trait that a minority but still existent percentage of critics does have. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Paul Scheer & Amy Nicholson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Paul Scheer & Amy Nicholson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

