meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Ancient Greece Declassified

R2.5 The Justice Loophole | Plato's Republic, book 2 w/ Rachel Barney

Ancient Greece Declassified

Dr. Lantern Jack

History, Education

4.8 • 587 Ratings

🗓️ 4 April 2021

⏱️ 54 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Our exploration of Plato's Republic continues with this discussion of book 2 with philosopher Rachel Barney. Is the fear of God necessary for morality? How can you educate people so that they value and practice justice?

Rachel Barney is professor of classics and ancient philosophy at the University of Toronto. She specializes in the work Plato and has spent many years analyzing and unraveling some of the key issues in the Republic.

------------------

Support the project

Via Patreon: patreon.com/greecepodcast

Or through a one-time donation: paypal.me/greecepodcast

------------------

Scholarly works mentioned during the conversation:

Rachel Barney. "Ring-Composition in Plato: the Case of Republic X," in M. McPherran (ed.), Cambridge Critical Guide to Plato's Republic. Cambridge University Press, 2010, 32-51. (pdf)

Jonathan Lear. "Inside and Outside The Republic," in Phronesis, 1992. vol. XXXVII/2 (pdf)

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi, thanks for tuning in to ancient Greece Declassified.

0:13.4

Episode R2.5, The Justice Loophole.

0:21.6

If God is dead, then everything is permitted.

0:26.6

That is one of the most famous lines from the works of Fyodor Dostoevsky.

0:30.6

At least that's the most commonly quoted version in English.

0:33.6

But a more accurate and fuller translation of the original Russian text is, quote,

0:38.6

If there is no God and no afterlife, is everything permitted?

0:43.2

End quote.

0:44.3

It's not a declarative statement, but a question, one that torments several characters

0:49.1

in Dostoevsky's final and greatest novel, The Brothers Karamazov.

0:53.8

It's also, as you'll recall, one of the

0:56.1

main questions that arises in Plato's Republic. In book two of that work, Glaucon and

1:01.3

Edomantus challenged Socrates to explain why people should be just, and why they should behave

1:07.1

morally, without recourse to religious arguments, without speaking about rewards or

1:11.7

punishments in this life and the next. As you can see, this question of whether the fear of God is

1:17.7

necessary in order to motivate people to behave morally has been asked on and off for thousands of

1:23.7

years and is still debated today. So what kind of answer does Socrates give?

1:29.4

Well, the short answer is that he gives a very long answer. It will take him the next eight books

1:35.1

to expound in full. But he lays out the plan for his answer in book two of the Republic.

1:41.0

We did an in-depth summary of that book in the last episode. For today's discussion,

1:45.6

we are joined by Rachel Barney, Professor of Classics and Ancient Philosophy at the University

1:50.9

of Toronto, and Canada Research Chair in Ancient Philosophy, who specializes in the work of

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Dr. Lantern Jack, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Dr. Lantern Jack and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.