Quick Bits: Baldwin’s Going To Trial! Scandoval lawsuit Update. Week 4 of the Karen Read Trial
The Emily Show
Baker Media, LLC.
4.9 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 27 May 2024
⏱️ 32 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Use code EmilyBaker50 at https://www.GreenChef.com/EmilyBaker50 to get 50% off, plus 20% off your next two months!
The judge made a ruling in the Scandoval lawsuit. Tom Sandoval’s demurrer was denied in the first cause of action as it pertains to eavesdropping and the third cause of action as it relates to the invasion of privacy.
A demurrer was granted with the 4th cause of action for the IIED and Rachel Leviss has 20 days to amend the complaint. A decision hasn’t been made with Ariana Madix’s Anti-SLAPP.
I also break down why the judge denied Alec Baldwin’s dismissal. A trial date has yet to be set.
Lastly, I recap week 4 of the Karen Read trial.
This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:
Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Chartable - https://chartable.com/privacy
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to quick bits. This week there's a ruling on Tom Sandoval's motion in the |
| 0:06.1 | Vanderbilt's rules litigation. You know where Rachel sued Tom and Ariana, that's the one, |
| 0:10.9 | and a final decision in Alec Baldwin's motion to dismiss in the rest case plus week four of the Karen Reed trial. |
| 0:20.4 | We are more than 40 witnesses in now. |
| 0:24.0 | So let's get into it. |
| 0:24.8 | I'm legal analyst Emily D. Baker. |
| 0:26.8 | This is the quick bits where I break down just the main points |
| 0:30.4 | at the pop culture and entertainment cases |
| 0:32.4 | I'm currently covering on YouTube and the Emily |
| 0:34.9 | show podcast. Let's get into it. |
| 0:37.0 | First, in the Scandevall lawsuit where Rachel sued, Tom and Ariana, I've been breaking that down both on the podcast and on YouTube, the judge ruled on Sandoval's motions only. |
| 0:51.5 | The briefing is nowhere near done yet on Ariana's |
| 0:54.7 | anti-SLAP motion that will come later. But in the demur which is essentially a |
| 1:00.5 | motion to dismiss on the face of the complaint. |
| 1:04.2 | The court denied it as to the first and third causes of action, |
| 1:10.4 | which are eavesdropping an invasion of privacy, but the court granted it as to the fourth cause of action, the intentional infliction of emotional distress. |
| 1:21.0 | Rachel is claiming that Tom recording her over FaceTime led to the intentional |
| 1:27.6 | infliction of emotional distress, but the judge said that she did not claim that her emotional distress was related to his actions and that he took those actions to cause her distress, but she has 20 days to amend, which is the way that it goes with a demur or a motion to dismiss. |
| 1:45.5 | Generally if anything is dismissed there is time to amend it and remember at this stage of |
| 1:50.4 | the motions the court takes everything in the pleadings as true and just evaluates |
| 1:56.0 | whether the pleadings on their face are sufficient to plead those causes of actions, |
| 2:02.0 | assuming all facts are true. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.