Well Bill, this is the fun part when we get to put you in the hot seat and get you answering

some questions, always go to the archives of the questions a week if you are a regular

listener, viewer, reasonable faith in the podcast.

More than likely your question will be there.

Release some form of it.

But we do like to interact with these Bill and we'll take the first question here from

Clarence in the United States.

He says, thank you, Dr. Craig.

Thank you for your hard work to bless and equip the church.

I frequent your podcast often and have enjoyed listening to your work over the years.

My question is concerning the second premise and the Kalam Cosmological argument.

The premise, the universe began to exist.

In defense of this premise, you have argued greatly.

I have one objection to your defense.

You have said that it is impossible for the universe to consist of an infinite number

of past events because if it did, we would never be able to arrive at the present moment.

However, isn't it possible that we never do arrive at the present moment?

It seems to me like the present moment is infinitely fleeting.

The moment it becomes the present, it simultaneously becomes the past as the precipice of time

pierces on.

Is it possible that the present moment is not a metric of dividing infinity?

Is it possible that the future extends into the infinite potential?

...