Dr. Craig, we're trying to catch up on some of the questions that we've been needing

to get to.

The Q&A, I always want to remind people to go to the Q&A section at reasonablepate.org.

Not only will you probably find your question there or some version of it, but you'll find

it interesting as well as you go through those questions.

Here are some that we've received, Bill, that you can respond to, dear Dr. Craig.

If you know something, then do you know that you know that thing?

And if you know that, you know that thing, do you know that you know that you know?

And so on, the question could be reiterated.

For finite human beings, it seems that the answer pretty early on in that series of

questions is no.

That would just be a psychological limitation of ours.

But what about God?

Is the answer, yes, add infinitum in that potentially infinite series of questions that

could be generated, Ray, in the United States?

I want to commend Ray for noticing this epistemological problem.

He is quite right in rejecting this thesis that in order to know something, you must know

that you know it.

Sometimes this is called the KK thesis for know that you know.

And he's quite right in saying that the KK thesis would generate a vicious, infinite

regress.

And what is so significant is that the assumption of this KK thesis lies at the heart of skepticism.

...