Dr Craig, I'm going to put you in the hot seat and ask some questions from all over the world,

is from Zane in the United States.

Dear Dr. Craig, in several of your debates you mentioned that people before the time of

Jesus, or residing in isolated parts of the world could still perceive God's general

revelation of himself in nature and conscience. Would this imply that uncontacted

tribes like Aboriginal people etc

simply misunderstood what God revealed to them in nature,

taking it to be the work of multiple supernatural beings. What it similarly imply that they misunderstood the source of

human conscience and moral values as something other than God?

I would say not necessarily, Zaneane that could be the case but not necessarily I

think some people respond appropriately to general revelation and

recognize a supreme deity of the world and do recognize

his objective moral law. I think for example of people like Aristotle or of a person like Job in the Old Testament who was not an Israelite and yet clearly had a relationship with God. So while polytheism and human degradation

might be responses by some people, perhaps most people we would say to general revelation,

it isn't and shouldn't be thought to be universal.

Okay.

Question from Canada.

Hello, Dr. Craig, I was listening to your Defender's podcast on the Inspiration of

scripture, where you respond to a scholarly article about how the free will of man and the supervision of scripture

does not allow for a confluence to take place. You did a wonderful job of

defending the middle knowledge position as a viable alternative.

And perhaps we'll pause and just explain what that alternative is.

...