All right. Thank you, Scott Chanon, and thanks to all of you for being with us.

Right down our toll-free telephone number this Friday.

It's 800-941. Sean, if you'd like to join us, sort of anti-climatic, the quote, sentencing, non-sentence of Donald Trump in this ridiculous case in New York that, that, I mean, it will be overturned.

I'm 99.999% certain that that's going to be the case, regardless of what the appellate court

said about sentencing or the Supreme Court said about sentencing.

There are just too many issues in play here where corruption existed.

And it's frustrating.

I think the bigger argument, the better argument before the Supreme Court was Levin's

argument, which was they should use the supremacy clause and how there wasn't any jurisdiction for Alvin Bragg to come up with

his novel legal theory to bypass the statute of limitations that had come and gone.

And even on the federal side of this, I mean, the Department of Justice, as weaponized as it is,

had passed on this very issue.

And, you know, the fact that they were stacking these charges, one on top of the other,

added to the fact the Supreme Court decision, I believe it was July 1 on immunity.

And meanwhile, there were tons of evidence brought into play that, of Donald Trump's time as president that would

literally render the verdict, you know, meaningless.

It should have been thrown out for 100 different reasons.

It never should have been brought to begin with.

And it's sort of anticlimatic.

There might be a silver lining in all of this that silver

lining being that Donald Trump can now get now that he's out of Juan Mershahn's courtroom

that would now give him the the ability to go to another court and get this thing overturn

...