You ready?

I was born ready.

Welcome to the Advisory Opinions Podcast as always. This is David French with Sarah

Hysger. We've got multiple things to cover. We're going to have a fast Sarah

update on Supreme Court opinions today. We're going to talk about the Trump Executive

Order on Immigration, what it is, what it is not, and then Wax Elegant as you all have been

demanding about 8 USC Section 1182F. Number three, we're going to talk about homeschooling

controversies and with an emphasis on the law. And then we're going to wind up with a question

about what if the coronavirus pandemic persists among the cultural effects, what will be the impact

on cities. We weren't going to talk about that, but as we started to record, we got into this really

interesting conversation and our producer Caleb said, save it for the pod. So that's what we're going

to do. Well, let's just launch right into the Supreme Court. I've been jammed all morning,

so I have not been able to read the orders, but I did read them enough to know nothing there was

super interesting, but there were orders released and Sarah, you've got an update.

Sure. So three opinions got released today. Two of which are like, I don't know, they're

not very sexy. They're like, you know, fifth grade sexy. No ankle. Not even really some ankle,

I would say. So maybe like nice painted toenails. Okay. Okay. So one is County of Maui versus

Hawaii Wildlife Fund. That was a clean water act case. Breyer wrote for the majority, and it's like

a another seven part Breyer balancing test. I have a friend who does the best impression of justice

Breyer, by the way, like it's almost worth having him on the pod just for the impression. This was

six three with the chief and Kavanaugh joining the liberal four, and then the other three quote-unquote

conservatives dissenting. It's, you know, navigable waters and all of that. It was a win for the

...