meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Quanta Podcast

Quantum Tunnels Show How Particles Can Break the Speed of Light

The Quanta Podcast

Quanta Magazine

Life Sciences, Science, Physics

4.7638 Ratings

🗓️ 21 January 2021

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Recent experiments show that particles should be able to go faster than light when they quantum mechanically “tunnel” through walls.

The post Quantum Tunnels Show How Particles Can Break the Speed of Light first appeared on Quanta Magazine

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Quantum Magazine's podcast.

0:07.3

Each episode, we bring you stories about developments in science and mathematics.

0:12.2

I'm Susan Vallett.

0:14.4

No sooner had the radical equations of quantum mechanics been discovered when physicists identified one of the strangest phenomena the

0:23.0

theory allows, quantum tunneling.

0:26.4

It shows how profoundly particles like electrons differ from bigger things.

0:37.1

Throw a ball at the wall and it bounces backward.

0:40.1

Let it roll to the bottom of a valley and it stays there.

0:43.3

But a particle will occasionally hop through the wall.

0:47.2

Or as two physicists wrote in nature in 1928, it has a chance of slipping through the mountain

0:53.6

and escaping from the valley.

0:55.9

That's one of the earliest descriptions of quantum tunneling.

0:59.6

Physicists quickly saw that particles' ability to tunnel through barriers solved a lot of mysteries.

1:05.5

It explained various chemical bonds and radioactive decays and how hydrogen nuclei in the sun are able to overcome their mutual repulsion and fuse producing sunlight.

1:18.3

But physicists became curious. Mildly at first, then morbidly so. They wondered how long does it take for a particle to tunnel through a barrier? The trouble was,

1:30.9

the answer didn't make sense. The first tentative calculation of tunneling time appeared in print

1:37.8

in 1932. Ephraim Steinberg, a physicist at the University of Toronto, says earlier calculations may have been done in private.

1:47.4

I suspect a lot of the history is missing.

1:49.4

I think it's because these calculations aren't so hard,

1:52.9

but when you get an answer you can't make sense of, you probably don't publish it.

1:56.5

It wasn't until 1962 that a semiconductor engineer at Texas Instruments wrote a paper that explicitly

2:04.6

embraced the shocking implications of the math. His name was Thomas Hartman. Steinberg says

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Quanta Magazine, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Quanta Magazine and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.