Hey, this is Trey. Thank you for joining us for a Thursday edition of our podcast, which is Q&A day and a day that I look up very forward to because I don't have to ask questions. I get to answer them. And they're thought-provoking. And so keep them coming. Any kind of question is welcome, although the answer probably depends on the subject matter.

If you want a long answer, make it legal or sports.

If you want silence, make it science or math.

Well, Trey, it's great to be here.

And you're right.

Science and math questions are welcome. But it might be a shorter answer, but we've got some great questions today. Thank you all for sending them our way. We actually will end with a sports-related question today, so you're ready to get started, Trey?

Good, yes. I'll hope. You want to jump to that one?

We'll make you wait just a little bit.

Okay. All right.

I say patience is a virtue, but it's really overrated. It's an overrated virtue.

That's a funny quote. Well, we'll practice the patience for this time, and we'll save that sports for the

end. And we'll start with Tom from Texas, who writes,

if Durham had all of this recently released information on the Russia hoax, why was it not

included in the original release, or at least presented to Congress in a secure setting?

It wasn't released to the public because it's classified.

As for Congress, the notion that sharing things with Congress will somehow keep them secret

is a myth.

Secrets actually die in Congress.

That's why the so-called classified briefings are worthless for the most part.

The folks who sometimes can gain access would be gang of aid or members of the Intel Committee.

I think Durham's report was released while Biden was president, if memory serves me correctly,

and the report would have gone to Merrick Garland, who was the AG.

...