All right, Alexander, let's talk about the Trump-Puton phone call and what the Washington Post claims Putin offered to Trump or demanded of Trump.

And then let's also talk about the Financial Times article, which details the meeting, the closed door,

closed door meeting at the White House between Trump and Zelensky,

which according to the Financial Times and their European sources,

they claim that the meeting did not go well between Trump and Zelensky, and that Trump was very

angry with Zelensky and throwing papers and maps around and stuff like that and making

demands of Zelensky.

But the interesting part to, or the interesting narrative to both the Washington Post article

and the Financial Times article, in my opinion, is that the Washington Post relied on two sources.

One of them was a European diplomat.

And the Financial Times appears to be relying completely on European diplomats for their sourcing.

So someone is leaking. Someone is leaking. Is it the

Trump White House leaking to the Europeans? Or is it the Zelensky team that was accompanying

Zelensky to the meeting in the White House that are calling up the Europeans and leaking to them

what was being said during the White House meeting? calling up the Europeans and leaking to them what was being said during

the White House meeting. I think I know which one I'm leaning towards, but what do you think?

Well, I think the first thing to say, and it's implicit in your question, and it is obviously true,

is that these are very, very contaminated sources. These stories we should take extremely seriously. I mean, the Washington Post has been enormously hostile to Trump throughout the time that he has been, Trump has been in politics. It was a huge supporter of all the allegations that were made against Trump back in his first term. And it clearly has a

very strong connection with people in, you know, the American deep state, the permanent government,

trans-abonance people of that kind. And it has a very, very pro-Zolensky, pro-Ukraine bias, and undoubtedly that is playing a significant

role in its reporting. In the case of the Financial Times, I think you can go a step further.

I think that the Financial Times is being fed information straightforwardly by the British

...