Welcome back to part two. If you missed part one, you've gone too far. Make sure you're

following at conservative daily everywhere else. Let's jump right in, hit the subscribe

button, and be an ambassador of truth. Enjoy the show.

It'll allow a weapon to be more accurate, and that's assuming that you're using something

that is not some cheap aftermarket stuff. But if you're using something that adds

stability to a weapon system, then yes, you could make it. I just had a surprise guest

show up. Then you could make it to where, yeah, because it's more accurate, you can inflict

more damage. And that idea, yes, but no, it doesn't make the weapon system itself more

dangerous. It just makes it more stable.

It's funny, because stable actually makes it safe. They talk about dangerous, yes, the

whole purpose of, yes, guns are for shooting people. Like, let's just get past that really

small elephant room. Yes, guns are for shooting people. They were designed to cause damage

to other people. They were designed to kill people. Yes, that is a fact. Just like bombs

were made to blow shit up, and cars were made to transport people. That is what guns

are for. That is what the, that's why they want to arm the IRS people with guns apparently

about, anyways, let's have, let's have an expert with the bureau to have him talk about

stable invasion.

Ten years for owning a piece of plastic that was, that you were told was legal and that

you own for a decade and that millions of people did. This is what offends the sensibilities

of Americans, whether they own these or not. Do these, do these make the gunfire more rapidly?

The, the, the, the, the stabilizing, do these increase the muzzle velocity? The stabilizing

brazen.

...