Ready?

I was born ready.

Welcome to advisory opinions. I'm David French. That's Sarah Isker, and you might have noticed a reversal of roles here for a moment. I'm weighing in as host today because Sarah has returned from vacation and is recovering from what? Fried rice induced food poisoning, Sarah? Is that what we're dealing with?

There's good news and bad news. The good news is I had chronic bronchitis for seven weeks.

After two rounds of antibiotics, I am good to go. No more chronic bronchitis. The bad news is that I celebrated with some airport

fried rice. That was a mistake. I see that now. Yeah, celebrating, the phrase celebrated with

airport fried rice has never been uttered before in the English language and may never be

uttered again after your experience. But that's not what we're going to be talking about today.

So we're going to do the B side of the Venezuela operation.

Earlier this week on Tuesday, David Latte and I talked about what you might call the A side.

In other words, was the actual operation lawful?

We talked about that at great length.

And then this is the B-side.

What about the indictment?

It's the indictment itself,

as opposed to the military operation,

is the indictment lawful is the indictment

going to survive in federal court.

So we're going to talk about that for a bit.

We're going to tie up loose ends from reader questions

about our Venezuela discussion from before. And then we've got a really apopery of really

interesting circuit court opinions, one about mandatory diversity training, one about the

...