Okay, it's a great way you articulated that because, again, if you look at back when Bitcoin

was created, at the time, it's solved a bunch of problems that the market had, and so,

again, the market tested it, it had a use case, which was Silk Road, and again, it brought

a lot of value to people, but then we needed the next stage, and then Ethereum came in

with all of these wish lists, all the antinopolis wish lists with the smart contract, etc.

But of course, it couldn't foresee that itself might have its own growth issues, and thanks

from seven years from now, and it looks like Charles is trying to look at 10, 20, 30 years

ahead.

Maybe now, since we at least have a base of what we maybe know what this is, we can maybe

see a little bit further ahead in time.

Now, probably you can't see 100 years out, but Charles is thinking 20, 30, 40 years

out, whereas that would probably be impossible with Bitcoin creation, because you didn't

even know if it was going to go anywhere.

So that's a really good explanation, and I think, look, even Vitalik has said in interviews

that he's the guy that builds it, and he's not the white paper guy, he's not a big fan

of white papers, because he thinks the use test is the real test, as opposed to all of

the theory.

And again, I'm an MIT grad, but I'm also an engineer, so I went to work for a motor company,

we built cars that went on the road, I didn't sit in the lab and create theories.

So I see where both have their places, and it looks like Charles is doing the longer

game, and that could create an amazing piece of infrastructure.

I guess we'll just have to see how that plays out.

...