meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
DINESH Podcast

PROGRESSIVE FALLACY

DINESH Podcast

Salem Podcast Network

News, News Commentary, Politics

4.76.8K Ratings

🗓️ 6 July 2022

⏱️ 51 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode, Dinesh debunks the progressive vision of Woodrow Wilson recently elevated by Justice Kagan. A new case the Supreme Court will take up that goes to the heart of who decides how elections are run in America. Dinesh looks for a common thread in the best-run cities in America, and finds one. Congressional candidate Carmen Maria Montiel joins Dinesh to talk about her plans to unseat the notorious leftist Sheila Jackson Lee.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is brought to you by my friend Rebecca Walzer. Rebecca is a financial expert

0:04.7

who can help you protect your wealth during this volatile market. Book your complimentary call

0:09.4

with her team by going to friendofdenesh.com. Today I'm going to talk about the Progressive fallacy,

0:16.4

the Progressive Vision of Woodrow Wilson, recently elevated by the way in an important case by justice

0:21.9

Kagan. A new case to the Supreme Court is going to take up is going to go to the heart of how

0:27.2

elections are run in America. Debbie and I are going to talk about the best run cities in America

0:32.2

and what's the common thread that makes them work. And Congressional candidate Carmen Maria Montiel

0:37.9

is going to join me. We're going to talk about her plans to unseat the notorious leftist Sheila

0:42.8

Jackson Lee and I'm going to continue my introduction to Homer's Iliad. This is the Dinesd

0:47.8

Sousa Show. America needs this voice. The times are crazy and the time of confusion,

1:04.9

division and lies. We need a brave voice of reason, understanding and truth. This is the

1:11.6

Dinesd Sousa podcast. In the Supreme Court's recent EPA decision, this was West Virginia versus EPA,

1:25.6

the issue front and center was the ability of the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency,

1:33.2

to use the broad rubric of the Clean Air Act, cleaning up the air, to somehow wipe out the

1:42.0

coal industry and pose prohibitive regulations that would cause essentially coal companies to go

1:48.0

completely out of business and proceed from there on the basis that this was a crusade that the

1:54.5

EPA would lead to take on climate change. And the Supreme Court basically said, no, that's not

2:03.1

something the EPA has any congressional authority to do. The actual Clean Air Act was passed under

2:09.3

Nixon 1971, I believe. No one was even talking about climate change. That wasn't the delegation

2:16.8

of authority. And so if Congress wants to make new laws that deal with climate change, that's a

2:21.6

separate issue they can. But the EPA can't just take it upon itself to launch this kind of a crusade.

2:29.2

In other words, the executive branch doesn't get to make laws or to irrigate to itself authority

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Salem Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Salem Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.