The one that they want to take out is homosexuality.

That's the one they want to take out.

It's not all the incest.

I've never heard a good response to this.

I've never heard a reasonable, thoughtful, like, wow, that really makes me challenge.

I've never heard a good response to this I usually people just ignore it

what would you say to the objection that if we don't follow the old covenant anymore why

should we care about Leviticus 18 well the old covenant the old, the Law of Moses really, in that section of scripture, there is Leviticus 18, which gives us specific rules about homosexuality among that that's the controversial part here right is the it's the

homosexuality part it's also a section that does this so do if you're gonna throw it out

do you want to throw out all these things here's one of the reasons why you shouldn't

then if he shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. He's talking about sexual

relations. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father or of your mother. She's

your mother. I like how it just says she is your mother. You shall not. We

obviously still want to apply this today. The one that they want to take out is

homosexuality. That's the one they want to take out. It's not all the incest and

then finally we have obesity that's being said you know not to not to do as well

but it's in Leviticus 18 it's the part about

homosexuality that they don't want verse 22 you shall not lie with a male as

with a woman it's an abomination these are all things that God is saying in the same passage.

Here's another point.

Much of the New Testament reiterates Old Testament statements.

Much of the new, it reiterates, meaning that these are not, yes, they're part of the

...