Well, so he says a communist threatening assault, not breaking any stereotypes I see, and then I say a classical liberal evolving into a raced realist, same, okay? And then that got him really fucking going, like all of our super soldiers out there.

Thank you so much they all jumped in it was really mad that we referred to him as a classical

liberal. That's the part that's the part. Yes he did not deny the race realism part. It was amazing.

I'm an anarcho-capitalist.

How dare you call me a classical liberal?

Well, he did say he's like, I don't even know what race realism is.

Just look at the science, and then he posted a link to

race realism.

So this is where I think that your powers of logic will come in because I finish this out because it was a hit and run you know you

you nail a guy like this and you just you don't you don't keep it going you let your followers follow

up on that and I said and correct me if I'm wrong here, sir, if the grammatical, sir, if this is the Wendy's, no, sir, if the grammatical

construction of our reply, talking about our account, mirrored exactly that of your original post and you can

construe the last two lines as a threat is it safe to assume then that your

intent in the O.P. was to openly threaten a civil war over multiculturalism. No answer. But that is implied, does it not?

Because if he said, you set the stage for Civil War, we said you set the stage for a milkshake and he said that we were threatening assault that means he's threatening civil war is it not is that not the case.

Yeah, yeah if you know if X then Y is play mall in your advocate as he often

to play mulling your advocate as he often does his brand is like I'm just

trying to warn you about the dangers of multiculturalism and

communism.

Well, maybe Sean was trying to warn him about the danger of having been a

milkshake all over your shirt.