All right, Alexander, let's talk about the big document that everyone is talking about,

which is the U.S. National Security Strategy, the new security document, which defines outlines

and defines U.S. foreign policy going forward for the next one year, two years,

three years, I don't know, until a new president comes into, comes into power. Anyway,

this is another document, an important document. Many people believe that much of it was drafted

by Colby in the Pentagon.

This is going to be the United States' roadmap for foreign policy going forward over the

remainder of Trump's presidency. Your thoughts on this document?

Well, 33 pages.

33 pages.

And I would say that it is very, very different from similar strategic security documents

that we've seen out of this series, come out of the United States,

come out of the Pentagon before. But I think a few things to say about it. Firstly, it is not a

complete break with the past. I mean, it would be an error to think that it was, but neither is it a continuation of the past into the indefinite

future.

It's somewhere in between.

So there is a lot of neocon thinking, Wolfovitz doctrine thinking still there, but at the same time, it does actually represent a real break and a real evolution

of policy and a change in direction. If, if, and it's a very big if, it is ever put into practice.

Now, Trump himself obviously endorses it. He's not only signed

off on it, but he's written a preface for it. So he's obviously in harmony with the ideas that

it sets out. But we've seen that Trump himself can change from one week to the next.

So, you know, it might be the strategy that guides the administration for the next three years,

...