meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

PREMIUM-Ep. 328: Yascha Mounk Against Identity Politics (Part Three)

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Casey, Paskin, Philosophy, Linsenmayer, Society & Culture, Alwan

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 10 November 2023

⏱️ 10 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Mark, Wes, Dylan, and now Seth too discuss further Mounk's project in The Identity Trap and what philosophically we can glean from it.

If you're not hearing the full version of this part of the discussion, sign up via one of the options described at partiallyexaminedlife.com/support.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're about to hear a preview of partially examined life supporter exclusive content.

0:10.4

To learn how to get the whole thing check out partially examined life.

0:13.0

com slash support.

0:15.0

You're listening to the partially examined life episode

0:18.0

328 part three we've been discussing

0:21.0

Yasha Monks new book the identity trap I want to start us off with a

0:26.2

framework that I want to throw out before we just get into ripping on this book or whatever which is

0:31.7

we have of course spent a lot of time evaluating ethical theories, right?

0:35.6

You get a general rule, you then put that against real or imagined consequences and

0:41.5

you decide whether that rule was good.

0:44.1

If you run against something that is counterintuitive, something, oh, you actually have to

0:49.1

murder all these people.

0:50.3

Well, that's not a good ethical theory or you have to decide that the way that you are

0:53.8

applying the ethical theory to this case isn't actually the right way, that you're

0:57.7

misunderstanding the ethical theory. We've also, in our philosophy of science

1:01.4

episodes, talked about a scientific paradigm a scientific research program as

1:06.0

Lakatosh called it where you have a set of claims and you likewise evaluate those against experiments and as we've talked about it's not just that if an experiment

1:17.2

doesn't turn out as the theory would predict that you throw away the theory

1:21.0

it's that you may be you throw away one of the subordinate claims,

1:23.8

or maybe you decide that you were not understanding

1:27.2

either the theory or the results of that experiment correctly.

1:30.9

But we have not really talked about in this level of detail ideologies.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.