Hey folks, it's Mark from The Partsley Examined Life.

So I'm sure you noticed that part 2 of our client's epistemology naturalized discussion

was not as has been the case for the past couple years, hidden behind a paywall.

We missed having a release every week for the public, but we also liked what we got to

do with our supporter-only discussion continuations.

So basically what we used to do over two parts, now we're doing over three parts and it's

this third part that is being preserved for our paid supporters.

So we can be extremely free with our opinions so we can dive deep, deep, deep into the

text.

If you want the full partially examined life experience, you should become a supporter.

You can see several ways of doing that at partiallyexaminelife.com slash support.

What you're about to hear is a short preview of that part 3 discussion.

I did not give you the very beginning of the discussion where we recapped the whole indeterminate

save translation thing.

Instead you'll hear the second 10 minutes of the discussion where we turned to our close

reading of the text.

So where we are, I guess it's around 82, you know, as he moves on from this indeterminate

save translation portion, he will do a little summary I think at the top of 82, which is

to say a little recap of what we've gotten so far.

A statement of the world doesn't always are usually have quote have a separable fund

of empirical consequences that it can call its own.

So we've got a little bit into that in the last part so that you can't just take any

...