Coming to you from the Hagman Report dot com studio located in the Keystone

State. The birthplace of a mighty nation gets your host does Hagman.

Welcome to Hagman. This is the Hagman Report for today. It is Wednesday, January 12, 2022.

I want to thank everyone for joining me today. Thank you so much for your belief and trust in this platform.

I have a lot to get into this segment starting with this. Yesterday, I left off with or I discussed the Project Bear Toss information.

And Dr. Malone had an interesting take on this because I went through the entire document dump including those that we had already known with Project Bear Toss.

Okay. Now, here's the thing. I believe in Project Bear Toss. I believe in what they go out and what they get.

And I believe that they do vet their information. However, Dr. Malone yesterday, and this was linked on band.video as well.

Now, I got to read in the documents and it was almost like, man, this is too good to be true. And in fact, I uttered that to myself.

Well, is it too good to be true? I'm just asking the question. Look, I'm not saying the documents are false. I'm saying that the context in which the documents were presented to Project Bear Toss and maybe even the deep fake prospect.

Are we being all set up? It's just healthy to ask that question. I don't know. I don't know.

So are we redacting? No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, we're not redacting a thing. Try to get in trouble.

Ah, man. No, I'm serious. No, unless you know, no, no, no, there's no one less here. But so when I went, but when I read that again, and I'm thinking to myself, you know, as an investigator, I would love to get like a confession.

And I've gotten statements that implicate the people and I've gotten people to confess in writing and in conversation.

They're just sick of me badgering them, I guess. But, but, but you know what?

Take a look at what Dr. Malone says here. I'm just going to toss this out. Could we be, and I'll ask you, Eric, that that could be that we're getting kind of, you know, I don't know.

We're getting set up in a way because the, the verbiage in these documents, and especially the one email was really like consistent with everything that we've been saying to consistent.

And Dr. Malone kind of brought that up. I'm just asking. I'm asking the question. I'm putting it out there. You know, there are a lot of great citizen investigators. I'm telling you right now. And you couldn't take a look and you can see, you can ask the questions.

I don't think we are getting set up to answer your question. Or I don't think we're, we're never going to redact. No, no, no, because this is the, this is the truth. It's a matter of fact, we're going to double down.

Yeah, the only way we would redact would be if they came out and said, oh, yeah, this is a, you know, we caught it and it was a hoax. And of course, but we're just presenting information to you.

But let's look at what Dr. Malone said. This is, again, I'll link, I'll put the link in the description box at haggmanreport.com, but this got, got me thinking.

He got me thinking. Now, he tempered his, his remarks. It's brought this. He didn't kind of scientist. So, and he's worked with the DOD before.

...