meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Curiosity Weekly

“Popular Opinion” Isn’t What You Think

Curiosity Weekly

Warner Bros. Discovery

Science

4.6964 Ratings

🗓️ 22 February 2021

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Learn about why popular opinion might not be as popular as you thought; a new analysis that’s debunked the blood type diet; and a pool of water in Kidd Creek Mine in Timmins, Ontario, Canada, that’s 2 billion years old.

One person repeating an opinion makes people think it's a popular opinion by Kelsey Donk

A new analysis has debunked the blood type diet by Grant Currin

The World's Oldest Known Pool of Water Is a Staggering 2 Billion Years Old by Joanie Faletto

Subscribe to Curiosity Daily to learn something new every day with Cody Gough and Ashley Hamer. You can also listen to our podcast as part of your Alexa Flash Briefing; Amazon smart speakers users, click/tap “enable” here: https://www.amazon.com/Curiosity-com-Curiosity-Daily-from/dp/B07CP17DJY

 

Find episode transcript here: https://curiosity-daily-4e53644e.simplecast.com/episodes/popular-opinion-isnt-what-you-think


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi, you're about to get smarter in just a few minutes with Curiosity Daily from

0:04.8

Curiosity.com. I'm Cody Goff, and I'm Ashley Hamer. Today you learn about why a

0:09.0

popular opinion might not be as popular as you thought. a new analysis that's debunked the blood type

0:14.8

diet and a pool of water that's 2 billion years old.

0:19.3

Blood satisfy some curiosity.

0:21.3

People are always influenced by popular Let us find some curiosity.

0:22.6

People are always influenced by popular opinion.

0:25.9

It's human nature.

0:26.9

But here's a weird psychology quirk.

0:29.8

Our perceptions of which opinions are popular aren't always accurate. In fact research shows that when

0:36.1

one person repeats an opinion over and over we tend to think it's a popular opinion.

0:41.6

This comes from a surprising study from 2007,

0:45.5

which involved a series of six experiments with more than a thousand participants.

0:50.1

The experiments varied, but they generally went like this.

0:54.0

Participants would be told that a group of people was expressing their opinions on a controversial issue.

1:00.0

Then some of the participants were given one opinion to read and others were given three.

1:06.0

In some of the three opinion conditions, each opinion was attributed to a different person.

1:12.0

In others, all three were from the same person.

1:15.8

The results, people were more likely to assume a position

1:19.1

as the majority belief when it's repeated by multiple people than when they read one opinion from one person.

1:25.0

But hearing one person expressed the same opinion multiple times had nearly the same effect as hearing that opinion from multiple people.

1:35.6

So why is this? Well the researchers say it all comes down to familiarity.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Warner Bros. Discovery, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Warner Bros. Discovery and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.