meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Political Gabfest

Political Gabfest - The “Nevertheless She Persisted” Edition

Political Gabfest

Slate Podcasts

News, Politics, Government

4.48.5K Ratings

🗓️ 9 February 2017

⏱️ 54 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

David Plotz, Emily Bazelon and John Dickerson discuss the legal fight over the President Trump's immigration executive order, the confirmation battles of DeVos and Sessions and Elizabeth Warren's grandstanding, and debate if comedy can shape public opinion and policy. 

Join Slate Plus! Members get bonus segments, exclusive member-only podcasts, and more. Sign up for a free trial today at www.slate.com/gabfestplus.

Twitter: @SlateGabfest

Facebook: facebook.com/Gabfest

Email: gabfest@slate.com

Show notes at slate.com/gabfest


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The following podcast contains explicit language.

0:10.3

Hello and welcome to the Slate Political Gab Fest for February 9th, 2017, the Nevertheless She Persisted Edition.

0:16.9

I'm David Plotz of Atlas Obscura.

0:19.5

Joining me here in Washington, D.C., is, of course, John Dickiggerson of Face the Nation. Howdy, John? Howdy. And from her cubicle, not her cubicle, her cubicle, her cubby. It's anything but a cubicle. What's the term? I just lost the term. It's a wild office. Her Heidi hole in New Haven. It's a womb of comfort and warmth. Is Emily Bazelon of the New York Times Magazine. Hello. Hi, guys. What's up? Oh, you know, Thursday morning. Actually, super amounts of snow blowing outside my window. Oh, that's it's up. That's nice. There was none in Washington. Yeah, it's no Washington. Washington got bypassed. On this week's

0:56.4

GabFest, the legal fight over President Trump's immigration refugee ban. Then the confirmation

1:04.1

battles over Betsy DeVos and Jeff Sessions and Elizabeth Warren's spectacular grandstanding therein, then Saturday Night Live

1:15.0

versus Trump does the spat over comedy of the portrayal of people in the administration.

1:21.1

This is important.

1:21.9

Does it matter?

1:22.8

Can it shape public opinion and policy?

1:26.8

Plus, we'll have cocktail chatter.

1:28.1

And for Slate Plus, should you go to the White House correspondent's dinner?

1:32.5

Should you, listener?

1:33.8

John, did you literally yawn at that question?

1:36.3

That Slate Plus question?

1:37.4

You literally yawn.

1:38.2

I think we've talked about this before.

1:39.5

I know.

1:40.1

I'm remembering that we've already all distanced ourselves from the White House Correspondents dinner.

1:45.3

Well, should we instead talk about 1968?

1:48.5

Sure.

1:48.9

Sure.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.