And let's bring in now Peter Savatnik of the free press.

Welcome, Peter, thanks to joining us.

Thank you.

This whole Bordersar thing is bizarre.

They want us to believe she wasn't named Borders are even though she wanted to handle the root causes

She was asked to handle the border. That's on record already

Right. That's all that's all on the record. This is March 2021 when the president tasked Harris with, you know,

helming the kind of, you know, border surge, the surge of migrants at the border.

It's all very public.

It was reported on widely by every outlet.

Now we're quarreling over the terminology which is weird because the term

borders are as the peace notes that I wrote you know is actually an informal

term no one's actually a czar of anything in the United States government.

But it's just it's a reference to somebody who's in charge of something and she was in charge of it.

So you point out too and it's with tongue-in-che, just to make sure readers understand that Axios in 2021, in no way intended to provide Republicans in 2024 with a talking point that might help Donald Trump.

Actios has added editors note on the bottom of this new piece

that says this article has been updated and clarified to note

that the actuals was among the news outlets that incorrectly labeled

Harris a borders are well that's interesting rewriting history and admitting to it

what's what's most bizarre about that actually is that

Axios is claiming that it made a mistake when it didn't make a mistake.

So in other words, it's tarnishing itself, its credibility, because it's more important, apparently, to Daxios that it appear as

...