meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Peter Orszag's Plea for Less Democracy

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Cato, Peace, Policy, Politics, Markets, Defense, Government, News, News Commentary, 424708, Immigration, Libertarian

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 29 September 2011

⏱️ 10 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Thursday, September 29th, 2011.

0:07.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:08.0

President Obama's former Budget Director now says that the key to eliminating gridlock

0:12.0

is to make institutions in Washington a bit less

0:15.0

democratic.

0:16.0

For example, tax policy, he argues, should be less responsive to the demands of taxpayers.

0:22.2

John Samples, director of the Cato Institute's

0:24.2

Center for Representative Government, comments.

0:27.4

Peter Ozog was the Office of Management Budget

0:31.2

Director for Obama, and so he's now out of office and he's

0:34.1

bringing back his lessons for the rest of us and one of his lessons is that the

0:40.5

Congress isn't working very well but but it should. We need them to govern, we need them to deal with particularly the long-term deficit issue and so on.

0:49.0

So he says, why is it that Congress isn't working well it turns out the Congress isn't

0:56.0

working because the country is polarized and therefore in his view we have to

1:02.0

have changes in American government to make sure that

1:07.2

Congress doesn't have as much power and in fact what he's trying to do is cut electorates the voters out of the policy-making process.

1:17.0

Now, Madison, the chief architect of the Constitution understood that this polarization,

1:26.4

that this kind of gridlock was a likely result of how he wrote the document, how he crafted the Constitution.

1:36.2

Sure, I mean the Constitution itself is designed to prevent simple majority rule. If you wanted an efficient government, you would just

1:46.2

have one chamber and you, I mean, maybe you would have just opted for proportional representation. Instead, we have this

1:55.0

this convoluted complicated process that's designed to elicit broad consent

2:00.2

from the country rather than an efficient outcome.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.