Hey all for this and some other episodes.

If you want to see the unedited video of the Zoom call,

go to patreon.com slash philosophy improv and sign up for a small

per episode donation. Thanks.

This is Philosophy versus improv where two stages

try to teach each other a thing or two and maybe you the audience get something out of it as well.

This is Mark Glinton-Mire. I'm a philosophy dude who is here to learn to improv.

And I am Bill Arnet and improv dude here to

muck about enough philosophy pool for a little bit.

We haven't had one without a guest in a while.

During some partial exam and life discussion recently and the listeners will figure out which one.

I actually wanted to start improvving with the people on the call.

I did not dare. The bug has bitten you because it seemed like this was a thing to explore and I

could have you explore it instead. So if this is compatible with what you had in mind for today,

I'm wondering if you would start a scene where you are a character who has some sort of

irrational belief, maybe not irrational, but something that is a strongly held thing that I'm

supposed to argue against. I guess it would be best if it would strike the audience as

quite irrational. Well believe it or not, this might actually

dovetail in with the unpropless and funny how that happens.

Almost as though perhaps our fear that it ever might not is unfounded.

All I ask of you is that in the chat you send me a behavior.

And I think we've talked about behaviors before. This is how we describe other people to each other.

...