Race the rudder. Raise the sales. Raise the sales. Captain, an unidentified ship approaching. Over.

Roger that. Wait. Is that an enterprise sales solution? Reach sales professionals, not professional sailors. With LinkedIn ads, you can target the right people by industry, job title and more. Start converting your B2B audience into high-quality leads today.

Spent 200 euro on your first campaign and get a free 200-euro credit for the next one.

Go to LinkedIn.com slash XXX to claim your offer.

Terms and conditions apply.

Welcome to Science Talk, the weekly podcast of Scientific American for the seven days starting April 25th. I'm Steve

Mirsky. This week on the podcast, we'll talk with Scientific American Editor-in-Chief John

Rennie, just back from a big science journalism conference in Australia, and Bo Hammer. We'll

talk about the Franklin Institute Awards being given out this week in Philadelphia, as well

as some other things.

Plus, we'll test your knowledge about some recent science in the news.

First up, John Rennie, he was in Melbourne last week, attending the World Conference of Science

Journalists, where he was a member of a panel talking about peer review in science publishing.

And he also has some comments about a truly out-of-the-box idea about human

burial rights. I spoke to him in the library at Scientific American.

Hi, John. How are you?

Hi, Steve. Just fine.

You were at this conference and you were discussing, you're on a panel discussing peer review.

That's right. Let's talk about what peer review is, first of all.

That was actually one of the things that we talked about on this panel.

This was a panel called peer review of peer review.

Because what they wanted to do was they wanted to look at the peer review process, which is the one in which scientists, when they're looking at one another's work and deciding which papers deserve to appear in

...