So I look at how wide open I consider the NBA right now and its title chances.

And which player, which star, which all star, which superstar would benefit most for their legacy

purposes, for their legacy conversation by winning a title.

This was one of my three also. I didn't rank them, but this was one of my three.

So it's funny. I have six guys that I think realistically, and realistically is a, I stretch that

word because one of them is Chris Paul. And'm not sure he, like, it's realistic

to think he'll be the engine that drives them to a title.

He won't be the engine, but he gets to win it.

But that's why I don't know how much, like, I don't know how much his legacy would change

if the son's won the title and he's just like, you know, like,

it's really Devin Booker's title, you know, like I wonder how much it would do for Chris Paul's

legacy, almost in the sense that like Wade wins that title in 06. And that gives Shaq another title.

Don't get me wrong, but like that was Twain Wade's coming out party, you know? And it gave Gary Payton the title, but it doesn't change like the way that a lot of Gary Payton's career is viewed. Yeah, of course not. So I understand Chris Paul winning a title would validate a lot of his resume, but I also recognize he wouldn't be the engine that drove

them to a title. There's five other guys, though, that I'm curious what the historical

ramifications would be if we're sitting here at the end. It's like, oh, wow, so-and-so

just won the title. Now we view their legacy like this.

Can I ask a question?

Sure.

Of your five, have any of them won a title already?

Yes, one.

Yes, two of them have.

And it's why I'm curious.

...