but there's got to be a seizure of these criminal monies.

The money laundered that was created in the Southern District of New York.

It was created.

The scheme was created in the federal prison in the Southern Districts of New York,

with residents of the Southern Districts of New York.

So there's no question about venue and jurisdiction,

because the investments were even managed by the lawyers

in the Southern District of New York.

Well, let me ask you, let me ask you your opinion on why it hasn't been done.

What could be at play, based on your experience and your knowledge, what could be at play, why it's not being done?

And does it relate to a double-sided question here?

Two-tier question.

Does it relate to the removal of Berman?

Would it have been more a chance?

Let me rephrase.

Would the chances of a seizure been better if Berman stayed in place as opposed to him

being removed? And is that part of the reason he was removed? You get my drift.

The second prong of your point of removing and firing the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York

versus seizing the money rolling at over a billion dollars now is on the table.

It's on the table.

What you're fine-tuning, Michael, is to help focus the media as to Mr. Berman is firing and the seizure of the over billion dollars of criminal persons.

They're all on the table and they have to be done

...