that too many signals.

Why both of them would react to this to an extremely valid question?

Are people going to be surprised?

And it's like, I don't know, how would you...

I mean, it's like with the experience that Dan Bongino has

in, say, media training, maybe he hasn't gotten through formal media training, but he has

years of live streaming. He knows how to react on the fly. And he has the, he has work for the security

service. You know how to react on the fly on so many levels. And this question takes you

off balance. That, that is really suspicious. That is really suspicious. This was the point in which I say,

oh, no, there's, there's something in here. Too many emotional reactions.

Cash is not kidding. We've been personally briefed extensively.

Cash is not kidding. I want to stop in there because that is extremely important as well.

Cash is not kidding.

Who has said at any point that Cash is kidding?

Nobody.

Nobody has said that. The journalist has not made a loaded question or a bad faith question or implying that Cash Patel is kidding or joking or not serious about

these investigations. Nobody has said that. So he's implying, he's implying, oh, you're not taking

this seriously. Nobody has said that. Cash is not kidding. It's an overreaction to something that

never happened. Nobody's accusing cash of kidding or joking or

oh, he's serious. All right. Why do you have to say that? Why do you have to reinforce with an

empty statement instead of just saying, well, the facts.

The facts that you can reveal, of course,

...