You are listening to an art media podcast.

All these years, right?

I think the Iranians felt like, oh, America's never going to let Israel combat attack our nuclear sites.

No matter how much Israel threatens, they don't have the bombs.

And it showed not only is it possible that Israel will do it anyway, but then the U.S.

also joined in. And so it raises that threat level to Iran, raises their concern of, oh,

maybe we shouldn't even build a nuclear program if they're going to bomb it. Welcome to part two of this conversation.

In part one, we gave a tutorial on the science and the history of Iran's nuclear program until June 13th. Now we're going to talk about what remains of

it after the Israeli and U.S. attacks. And for that, we are joined once again by Lahav Harkov of

the Jewish insider and David Albright is still with us as he was in part one of this conversation.

La Hav, welcome back to the podcast.

Thanks for having me back.

So, La Hav, the early part of this week was one of the wildest news days in terms of conflicting

reports on the damage inflicted on the Fordo facility.

The reports were so contradictory that the only conclusion one could

reach was that no one can be trusted or very few people and experts can be trusted. I have my

own views on the quality of the reporting and the CNN report, but we can leave that for

another point in the conversation. You investigated this matter quite thoroughly. So first of all,

what do you think explains these contradictions? Explain what we heard from the CNN report

and then what we heard from the U.S. and Israel in response to that report. Why you start with

explaining that, describing that, and then we can get into what you make of the

contradictions?

...