meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakpoint

Parents’ Rights Up for a Vote

Breakpoint

Colson Center

Religion & Spirituality, News Commentary, Politics, Culture, Christianity, Currentevents, Worldview, News

4.82.8K Ratings

🗓️ 17 June 2025

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

State and federal cases are challenging the relationship between home and government. 

Related Resource

What Would You Say?: Do Children’s Rights Override Parental Rights?

___________

Get FREE access to the Why Life? video series at colsoncenter.org/whylife.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Breakpoint, a daily look, and an ever-changing culture through the lens of unchanging truth.

0:06.0

For the Colson Center, I'm John Stonmstreet.

0:09.0

In a letter dated June 1st, several organizations under the leadership of the Alliance Defending Freedom,

0:14.0

urged every member of the U.S. Congress to pass the Family Rights and Responsibilities Act.

0:20.0

This bill went enshrine into law the primacy

0:22.1

of moms and dads in the care of their own kids. Among other things, it would recognize the following.

0:27.2

First, the nature of the parent-child relationship endows parents with the primary responsibility

0:32.6

and obligation to care for their child. Second, from these responsibilities and obligations comes the pre-political

0:40.0

natural right of parents to care for their children. And third, the role of parents and the raising

0:44.9

and rearing of their children is of inestimable value and deserving of both praise and protection

0:50.1

by all levels of government. Now, the organizers chose June 1st in order to mark the 100th anniversary

0:55.7

of a consequential Supreme Court case that clarified parental rights back in 1925. Pierce versus the

1:02.5

Society of Sisters unanimously recognized a parental right to school choice, affirming what should

1:08.7

be obvious that parents, not the state, are the final authority

1:12.8

for their children's well-being. Though this case was formally about education, it had strong

1:18.0

implications for the relationship between home and government. In his majority opinion, Justice James

1:23.2

McReynolds wrote this, quote, The child's not the mere creature of the state. Those who nurture him and

1:28.4

direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for

1:33.3

additional obligations, end quote. Now, that common sense approach to the relationship between family

1:38.6

and the state is now being challenged. A dangerous alliance of government agents, medical professionals, educators, self-appointed

1:46.0

activist, and media outlets have decided to champion the world's children by challenging the

1:52.2

role of parents, essentially making moms and dads temporary and optional caretakers.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 20 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.