Welcome back. This is part four of the Serafin-Oltman double shot. This interview with Zach Schofstahl is awesome. If you miss the first three parts, you have a lot to catch up on. Here we go.

I'm like, okay. So I get back to the office and I'm like, guys, what's happening? They're like, well, since you left, the phone's been ringing from the AUSA with a laundry list of questions.

We've been working on answering.

I'm like, okay, Roger, well, I'm calling the AUSA,

because supposedly they're complaining.

She calls me back the next day.

And it's just, again, pretty well, just point blank.

It's, listen, I understand there's been some complaints

you guys are supposedly wanting stuff there's clearly a miscommunication here because neither i

nor my agents are aware of stuff that you've been asking for that we haven't given so when you

want something please email it to my agents so that we know exactly what it is that you want.

And then we can track that we get it back to you.

So then it's email, email, email.

I'm watching this correspondence go back and forth through my agency AOS and I'm watching them do their thing.

I'm well aware that they're drafting a second version of this affidavit.

Nothing I can do about it.

Well, the communication from my leadership

team, my management team, take leadership off the table. That's right. Is that, hey, once they're done,

we want to know what status is, your agents can review for PC and we're done here. Like, review for

PC, review for probable cause. So by the end of that week, I see emails between my

agents and the AUSAs where my agents are saying, hey, we haven't heard from you on today.

Is there anything else, anything else that you need? A would say comes back, no. Affidavit looks

...