meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
TALKING POLITICS

Outlasting Trump

TALKING POLITICS

Catherine Carr

News, News & Politics

4.7 • 2.5K Ratings

🗓️ 27 June 2019

⏱️ 46 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

We talk with Gary Gerstle about the big issues roiling US politics with likely aftereffects that will long outlast Trump's presidency. First up: the fight over the census. What's a stake in the citizenship question? How has American politics been shaped by people-counting in the past? And what is the Supreme Court likely to decide? Plus we look at constitutional reform, the environment and impeachment. These are the battles that could have consequences for decades to come. With Helen Thompson.


Talking Points:


The Trump administration wants to put the “citizenship question” on the U.S. census.

  • Lines are being drawn between personhood and citizenship.
  • If immigrants avoid the census, there could be consequences for Democrats.
  • The Republicans know that demographics are against them.
  • Trump probably wouldn’t have won the Republican primary without the backlash against immigration.


The United States was the first country to put a census in its constitution.  

  • The census is not connected to citizenship: it’s connected to personhood. 
  • Counting for the purposes of elections becomes complicated when you have a significant number of people in the country who are not citizens.
  • The census gives you the numbers, but what happens is up to the states. This is why state-level offices are so important. 


If Trump wins a second term, he will likely appoint two justices to the Supreme Court.

  • He has promised that he will only appoint people approved by the Federalist Society, which promotes an originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
  • There can still be meaningful differences when people get on the court: Gorsuch, for example, has been more willing to side with liberal justices than Kavanaugh.
  • But Kavanaugh and Gorsuch both are unlikely to uphold environmental regulations. 
  • If a Democrat wins, he or she will have to contend with a court that opposes the regulatory state.


What about the impeachment question?

  • Is there a principle at stake here? If not now, when?
  • The Mueller report is damning—it emphasizes that the fact that they are not indicting the president does not mean they are exonerating him.
  • Mueller’s July testimony will be significant: if impeachment is going to happen, the next few months are crucial.


Mentioned in this Episode:


Further Learning:


And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, my name's David Runderman and this is Talking Politics. It's a little more than four years

0:15.1

since Donald Trump announced he was running for president. It's a bit more than a week

0:18.5

since he launched his bid for re-election. But many of the

0:22.9

fights he's involved in are going to have effects that last much longer than electoral cycles.

0:27.8

And we're going to talk about some of those today.

0:35.5

Talking politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.

0:39.9

As politics speeds up, slow down with a subscription to the LRB, where Brexit and Trump are only part of a picture that includes, well, everything else.

0:51.0

Read relevant pieces and subscribe at a special rate at lrb.co.com.uk forward slash talking.

1:02.7

Helen Thompson is here and Gary Gerstall as well. Gary is a historian of the United States

1:07.3

and he has written among many other things about the history of identity and race

1:12.0

and citizenship and we're going to get to that to kick this off. So in the rhythms of American

1:17.3

political life there are these electoral cycles. Famously there's a two-year cycle for the House

1:22.1

of Representatives. There's a four-year cycle for the White House. There's a six-year cycle now for the

1:26.9

Senate and there's a 10-year cycle,

1:29.1

which is the census cycle, and that one is in the Constitution. It's mandated every 10 years.

1:34.9

And there is a fight going on about the census now. It's not the first time by any means that the

1:39.0

census and how it's conducted has become a huge political issue. We'll do some of the historical context, but I think we should start with the present.

1:46.8

So Gary, in your mind, what's at stake now in what people are calling the citizenship question?

1:52.8

Well, the Trump administration wants to put on the 2020 census a question about whether

1:58.8

the person being asked about various things is a citizen of the United

2:03.0

States. This would not be the first time that this has appeared on the census, but it would be

2:07.4

the most comprehensive. And it's being done at a time when the lines between personhood and

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.