meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Out to Lunch: California’s $20 Fast-Food Wage

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 21 May 2026

⏱️ 48 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

California’s $20 fast-food minimum wage cut employment by roughly 18,000 jobs and pushed up restaurant prices. Cato’s Ryan Bourne talks to UC San Diego economist Jeff Clemens about California’s wage-floor experiment—and the broader lessons for state and federal minimum wage policy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Cato podcast. I'm Ryan Bourne, Cato's R. Evan Sharf Chair for the Public

0:08.6

Understanding of Economics. California has become something of a real-time laboratory for high

0:14.3

targeted minimum wages. In 2024, the state increased the minimum wage from $16 per hour

0:20.3

to $20 per hour for fast food workers at large chains.

0:24.6

Now, that was one of the largest one-time minimum wage increases in US history, and one of the few focused on a single industry.

0:32.0

But what do we actually know about what happened when that policy went into effect?

0:36.2

And what do those results imply for new proposals

0:38.5

for higher minimum wages in other industries in Californian cities, and even a $25 minimum wage

0:45.0

at the federal level? My guest today is economist and minimum wage expert Jeff Clemens. He's a

0:50.3

professor of economics at UC San Diego, the co-author of two recent papers assessing the impact of the California fast food minimum wage on employment and prices.

1:01.2

Jeff, welcome to the podcast.

1:03.2

Thanks so much for having me.

1:04.7

Let's start off with the fast food minimum wage in California.

1:07.8

We always like to steal man, different policy ideas here at Cato. So what was the

1:13.8

original thinking and justification behind implementing this policy to begin with?

1:18.2

Sure. So as with most minimum wage increases, the primary objective of the policymakers

1:24.7

who advance the idea is to try to prop up wages for individuals whose wages put them at the bottom of the policymakers who advance the idea is to try to prop up wages for individuals whose wages

1:30.0

put them at the bottom of the income distribution. So the goal is to redistribute resources

1:35.2

towards those workers and improve their standard of living. In the California context, in particular

1:42.3

with the experimentation with the fast food-specific minimum wage, there's also a bit of a shift that we've seen a bit of a trend towards with some policymaking, both in New York and in California, kind of away from very broad-based minimum wages and towards additionally contemplating minimum wages that are specific to sectors like the

2:01.5

fast food sector, like to the gig economy. And also in my hometown of San Diego, there's

2:06.5

hospitality sector minimum wage focused on hotels that will be phasing in over the coming

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 12 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.