Originality

In Our Time: Philosophy

BBC

History

4.5 • 1.3K Ratings

🗓️ 20 March 2003

⏱️ 41 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Melvyn Bragg and guests explore the creative force of originality. How far is it to do with origins, how far with the combination of the discoveries of others, which were themselves based on the thoughts of others, into an ever-receding and replicating past? Is invention original? Is original important? Is tradition more interesting and the reworking of what is traditional of greater value than the search for idiosyncrasy? And did our notion of the original genius come as much out of a commercial imperative for individual copyright in the eighteenth century, as a romantic view of human nature which came in, perhaps not co-incidentally, at the same time? In 1800, in his preface to Lyrical Ballads, Wordsworth wrote "Every great and original writer, in proportion as he is great and original, must himself create the taste by which he is to be relished". But did the notion of originality begin with the Romantics in the 18th century, or has society always valued originality? Should we consider Shakespeare an innovator or a plagiarist?To what extent is originality about perception rather than conception and is originality a concept without meaning today?With John Deathridge, King Edward Professor of Music at King’s College London; Jonathan Rée, philosopher and author of Philosophical Tales; Professor Catherine Belsey, Chair of the Centre for Critical and Cultural Theory at Cardiff University

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Thanks for downloading the In Our Time podcast.
0:02.2	For more details about In Our Time and for our terms of use,
0:05.3	please go to BBC.co.uk.
0:09.2	I hope you enjoy the program.
0:10.8	Hello, Wordsworth wrote in 1800 in his preface to the Lyrical Balands.
0:16.0	Every great and original writer in proportion as he is great and original
0:20.0	must himself create the taste by which he is to be relished.
0:23.8	But did the notion of originality begin with the romantics in the 18th century?
0:28.4	Society has not always valued originality.
0:30.8	Should we consider even Shakespeare as an original or a plagiarist?
0:34.0	To what extent is originality about perception rather than conception?
0:38.0	And is originality a concept without meaning today?
0:41.0	With me to discuss this is Professor Catherine Belsey, chair of the Center for Critical and
0:45.9	Cultural Theory at Cardiff University, Jonathan Ray, philosopher and author, and John Deathridge,
0:51.2	Professor of Music at King's College London.
0:54.0	John Deathridge, what exactly do you mean by originality?
0:57.0	Well, I think today people think of originality in two ways, positive and negative.
1:02.0	I think people like the idea of newness, people being original.
1:06.1	On the other hand, they're rather suspicious of irrational newness. And I think people prefer the idea of originality something new or someone who's producing something new inside a tradition without
1:25.0	people stealing from everybody else and sharing a language.
1:29.0	Which is why I think this rather clever definition by Voltaire is quite good which is that
1:36.7	originality is nothing but judicious plagiarism I think that sums it up.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.