Anthropics CEO Dario Amodei has warned of the quote unquote yolo risk taking in the AI industry.

He talked about the AI bubble and his thoughts on where his company stood, where other companies

stood on this and framed this in a really interesting way.

I have not heard from many other CEOs since.

So today on the show, we're going to talk about what Anthropics

CEO thinks about the current state of AI, what we're moving into in the future, and the state of the quote-unquote AI bubble that we see today. Before we do, if you want to try the latest models from Anthropic, Open AI, Gemini, and all the other AI companies I talk about on the show, go check out my startup which which is AIbox.com. It's 20 bucks a month, and you get access to over 40 of the top models, including a bunch of audio models like 11 labs. You get a whole bunch of really cool image models like flux for image generation, Open AIs image model. And for $20 a month, you get access to all of the top AI companies. So you don't have to

have subscriptions, $20 subscriptions to $10 different places. 20 bucks a month, you get access to all them. You can compare them side by side. It saves all of your files in one place. You don't have to be like, oh, crap. Where did I have that conversation and go trying to log into a bunch of different places go check it out I'll leave a link in the description to AIbox. aai all

let's get into what Anthropic CEO was saying. This all happened at the

New York Times deal book summit. The CEO of Anthropic Dario Amadei, he gave one of the most

candid assessments of kind of this financial AI bubble. He was talking about what are some timing errors in the industry, what are some

unwise risks. I think in the process of all of this, he threw a lot of shade at an unnamed

rival that obviously is opening eye, but he never actually said their name. So the big question

that he was asked is AI in a bubble. And he says that the answer is a lot more complicated, rather than just saying, you know,

the whole sector is overvalued or underpriced.

He made, I think, what I would call a much subtler argument.

He said that he, you know, remains fundamentally bullish on the long-term economic potential

of AI.

But he also stressed that the timing of when value materializes is not very

certain. He said that the uncertainty is, you know, creating kind of these operational and

financial dangers. Here's a direct quote. He said, quote, there is an inherent risk when the

timing of the economic value is uncertain. Companies essentially are taking these really aggressive bets, not just to compete in the

market, but to stay ahead of these, quote, unquote, authoritarian adversaries, like, out

...