Hey, it's me James Stacy, and this week we've got a case back grudge match following a recent set of point

counterpoint stories posted to Hodinke. Joining me are the arguing authors of both their own

discontent and the stories at hand, Jack and Danny. It's a case-back conundrum,

so let's peer through the looking glass in the hopes of closing this case once and for all. And the Jack, Danny, welcome to the show, how are we doing?

Jack, Danny, welcome to the show, how are we doing?

Closing the case. Nice case nice nice James yeah if you actually listen to those

sentences they're complete gibberish but I had fun writing so you guys good I guess Never been better. Still speaking to each other?

Jack and I are here together so I guess that means we're good. It's great.

I feel like Danny and I have done a disproportionate number of point counterpoints.

I still have a job. I tend to pick the fights with people who might be able to fire me.

Okay. And so I don't know why I keep doing that, but you know. That ain't me brother. I'm an independent contractor.

Is your 1099, Jay?

Collect that cash, no taxes.

All the way, baby.

The only thing I can fire both of you from is this show,

and I need both of you to have this episode.

So I think we should dig into some case back discussions.

This is an interesting one because you know in the past we've done these where I felt like I could

kind of pick aside whether it was the integrated bracelet thing like I kind of had an idea of where I landed on this. I don't really have a great

concept of how I feel about case backs like as a rule and I think it's kind of a multi-level

thing. Jack how about we start with argument, which I think is the more accepting

perspective of case backs, correct?

...