meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

On A Matter of $8000 Stolen by the Government

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 5 December 2022

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Cristal Starling of Rochester, New York just wants her money back. The government took it without even charging her with a crime. Lee McGrath of the Institute for Justice is representing her in court.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Monday, December 5th, 2022.

0:05.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:07.0

When the cops take your money, it shouldn't be that hard to get it back if you haven't been

0:10.0

convicted of anything.

0:11.0

In the case of Crystal Starling, a mobile food vendor in Rochester, New York,

0:16.0

she was never charged. She's still having a hard time getting anyone to listen about theft.

0:20.9

And getting thousands of dollars stolen from her back?

0:24.7

That would be icing on the cake.

0:25.9

I spoke with Crystal Starling and Lee McGrath of the Institute for Justice about her case

0:30.2

earlier this year.

0:31.8

You know, back in the the 1990s the Cato Institute published a book

0:35.4

by Henry Hyde and it was called forfeiting our property rights I believe or

0:41.5

something to that effect and it was really sounding the alarm on

0:46.7

this scourge of civil forfeiture and just to capitulate what that is detail in the shortest possible terms what civil forfeiture does.

0:58.0

Forfeiture is the process in which the state takes ownership of property in civil court, independent of criminal prosecution.

1:11.0

So in theory, a person could be acquitted of all criminal charges but still lose their car

1:19.0

still lose their cash for many reasons, one that the standard of proof is so much lower, this is

1:29.7

your OJ moment, that the standard of proof is only preponderance of the evidence

1:35.6

whereas in criminal court it's beyond a reasonable doubt. But more often the

1:42.2

amount of what has been seized and is being litigated in forfeiture

1:48.1

is so small that it's irrational for anyone to engage in the civil process and they default.

1:56.4

They don't respond to the notice, they don't file a complaint, they don't answer a complaint,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.